Thursday, June 9, 2011

AP Comp Gov - Historic Legacy of Tony Blair, "Iron Lady" Margaret Thatcher Questions

“The Historic Legacy of Tony Blair”

1. The author states that Blair “modernized the Labour Party.” How did he accomplish this? Describe “New Labour”.

  • Tony Blair modernized the Labor Party by removing the commitment in the party’s constitution to the nationalization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange and introducing a “Third Way”, between socialism and unfettered capitalism. New Labour relies on the idea that in order for public services to improve, the techniques of private business and the market need to be used to increase efficiency. Additionally, the state should not be the sole provider of public services.

2. Explain the “New Constitution” implemented since Labour came to power.

  • Reforms include a series of referendums and measures devolving more political authority to the non-English parts of the UK, including introducing proportional representation in elections for these parts. In 1998, the Human Rights Act was implemented, requiring public bodies to comply with the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. The 2000 Freedom of Information Act allows people in the UK right to freedom of information. Other acts contribute to this “New Constitution”, including the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act of 2000 (requiring the registration of parties and placing controls on political donations/national campaign expenditures, as well as establishing an Electoral Commission), the House of Lords Act of 1999 (which removed most of the hereditary peers from the House of Lords and more reforms), and the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 (which restructured the historic office of Lord Chancellor).

3. Explain the motivation behind Blair’s foreign policy. What is “moral imperative”?

  • “We need to enter a new millennium where dictators know that they cannot get away with ethnic censing or repress their people with impunity.” This was Blair’s justification for his controversial decision to invade Iraq. His foreign policy is based on values, rather than territory.
  • Moral imperative is the belief that Britain has a moral duty to intervene when something bad is happening in another country. It often becomes intertwined with humanitarian arguments.

­

“Iron Lady” Margaret Thatcher

1. Describe Margaret Thatcher’s background. How did her humble beginnings influence her political career?

  • Margaret Thatcher was born to an intensely religious family whose life revolved around Methodism, and lived above a grocery store her father owned with her family. She worked in the store, and learned the basics of economics. Her family was incredibly political. Her humble beginnings made her incredibly hard-working, determined to prove herself, and influenced her political beliefs and platforms.

2. Describe Thatcher’s rise to the head of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister.

  • In 1959, Thatcher was elected Conservative MP for Finchley. She became secretary of state for education and science in 1970. After the Heath government fell in 1974, Thatcher stepped in to challenge Heath as Conservative leader, winning in 1975. She earned her name as “the Iron Lady” in 1976 when she made a speech criticizing the Soviet Union. On May 4 (my birthday wooooot!), 1979, she was elected Prime Minister.

3. Describe “Thatcherism” or “Monetarism”. What problems did she face as PM? How did she address them?

  • Thatcherism/Monetarism was an economic theory that advocated individual enterprise and reduced state intervention. State-subsidized industry/jobs discouraged competition, put too much money into the economy, and caused inflation. Monetarism said that taxes and government spending on welfare should be lower so that individuals could use their money to support themselves as they chose.
  • As PM she faced many problems. The National Union of Mine Workers went on strike, threatening the national fuel supply; she responded to this by using coal reserves and not backing down. She responded to the invasion of the Falkland Islands by Argentina by sending ships to retake the islands and winning the war. Additionally, she helped persuade President Reagan away from the “evil Empire” rhetoric used to talk about the Soviet Union and therefore helped to end the Cold War.

4. What domestic programs and policies is Margaret Thatcher best remembered for? Was she successful?

  • Tatcher is remembered for the sale of council houses (which allowed a half-million people to become homeowners for the first time), introducing tougher legislation to curb future union power (following the strike of the Nation Union of Mine Workers), and unfavorably for introducing the poll tax. She was successful in the first two, but decidedly unsuccessful with the poll tax. In the end she stayed in power too long and was less favorably remembered than she would otherwise have been.

5. What effect did the Falkland War have on her government and reputation?

  • The Falkland war was very good for Thatcher. Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands, and Thatcher fought back, defeating them and retaking the islands. This instilled a new sense of national confidence and raised her popularity ratings.

AP Comp Gov - Introduction to Comparative Politics

Introduction to Comparative Government

Politics:

  • Politics: Having to do with human decisions
  • Political Science: the study of human decisions
    • Always public
    • Always authoritative
  • Politics refers to the use of compulsory and coercive means
    • Who gets to employ them and for what purposes

Different Forms of Government:

  • Night Watchman State
  • Police State
  • Welfare State
  • Regulatory State
  • State of Nature –theoretical existence of the world if there was no government
    • Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke

Political Systems:

  • Collection of related, interacting institutions and agencies
  • Mold and are molded by domestic and international forces
  • Comparative Politics is the study of political systems

What is Comparative Politics?

Politics: struggle in any group for power that will give one or more persons the ability to make decisions for the larger group

  • Public decisions
  • Within a community (political system)
  • Authoritative
    • Power: ability to get people or groups to do what they otherwise would not do
  • Coercive means
    • Force and monetary resources

Major Thinkers in Comparative Politics:

  • Aristotle
    • Separated the study of politics from philosophy, emphasized empirical study
  • Machiavelli
    • First modern political scientist
    • The Prince
  • Hobbes
    • “social contract” theory
    • advocated for a powerful state in Leviathan
  • Locke
    • Private property is essential to individual freedom and prosperity
    • Two Treatises of Government
  • Montesquieu
    • Separation of powers within government
  • Rousseau
    • Citizens’ rights are inalienable and cannot be taken away by the state
    • The Social Contract

Political system:

  • System: interdependent parts and boundaries
  • Political system: set of institutions and agencies (government, political organizations) that formulate and implement collective goals of a society or of groups within it

Political Systems: Environment and Interdependence:

  • Governments are the policymaking parts of political systems
  • A political system exists in both an international and a domestic environment
  • A system receives inputs from these environments
    • International: interdependence has increased enormously in the last decades; globalization
    • Domestic: economic, social, and geographic systems, political culture of its citizens

Political Systems: Structures and Functions

  • Structures – examples: parliaments, bureaucracies, administrative agencies, courts
  • Structures perform functions, which in turn enable the government to formulate, implement, and enforce its policies.
    • Policies reflect the goals; the agencies provide the means
  • 6 types of political structures:
    • Political parties
    • Interest groups
    • Legislatures
    • Executives
    • Bureaucracies
    • Courts

Major Government Functions

  • Community-building
    • Nation
      • Large-scale communities
      • Common perceived identity
    • Political culture
      • Public attitudes toward politics and their role within the political system
    • Political socialization
  • Providing security, law, and order
    • External security
    • National defense forces
    • Internal security
    • Police forces
    • Government monopoly
    • Protecting economic, social, and political rights
  • Promoting economic efficiency and growth
    • Market failures in capitalist economies
      • Property rights, competition, and information
    • Undersupply of public goods
      • Parks, roads, national defense, environment
    • Negative externalities
      • Environmental degradatior
    • Natural monopolies
  • Social Justice
    • Redistribute resources
    • Equal

Wealth Creation

Fostering Economic Development:

  • Two major forces transforming political systems and nations
    • Process of economic development
    • Political democratization
  • A political system cannot satisfy its citizens if it does not foster social and economic development
  • Living standards
    • Globalization, democratization, and marketization
    • HDI- Human Development index
  • Structure of the labor force

Process v. System Functions

  • Process Functions
    • Process of making policy
      • Interest articulation
      • Interest aggregation
      • Policy making
      • Policy implementation and abjudication
  • System Functions
    • Will the system be maintained or changed
      • Socialization
      • Recruitment
      • Communication

Political Culture

  • The attitudes, beliefs, and values which underpin the operation of a particular political system
    • Nationalism, legitimacy, role of citizens, perceptions of political rights, role of government, policy priorities

Political Socialization

  • How individuals form their political attitudes
    • Family, school, religious institutions, peers, social class, gender, media, interest groups, political parties, government institutions

Interest Articulation

  • How citizens express their views and participate in politics
  • Process of expressing needs and demands to the government
    • Protests
    • Interest groups
    • Contacting city council member

Citizen action: A dimension of interest articulation

  • Voting in an election (most common)
  • Working with others in their community/typically very policy focused
  • Direct contact with government
  • Protests or other forms of contentious action
  • Political consumerism

Interest Groups Make Demands

  • Interest articulation
    • Can occur through the action of social or political groups that represent groups of people
      • Anomic groups – spontaneous group
      • Nonassociational groups – working class as a collective
        • Large groups not formally organized
          • Collective action problem
        • Small villages
      • Institutional groups – the labor department within government
      • Associational groups – a labor union

Civil Society

  • Intermediary institutions that give voice to various sectors of society free from state control and enrich public participation in democracies
  • Professional associations, religious groups, labor unions, citizen advocacy organizations

Interest Group Systems

  • Pluralist:
    • Multiple groups may represent a single society interest
    • Group membership is voluntary and limited
    • Groups often have a loose or decentralized organizational structure
    • There is a clear separation between interest groups and the government
  • Democratic corporatist:
    • A single association normally represents each societal interest
    • Membership in the association is often compulsory and nearly universal
    • Associations are centrally organized and direct the actions of their members
    • Groups are often systematically involved in making and implementing policy.

Interest Aggregation

  • The activity in which the political demands (articulated interests) or individuals and groups are combined into policy programs
  • How interests are aggregated is a key feautyre of the political process
    • In a democratic system, two or more parties compete to gain support for their alternative policy programs
    • In an authoritarian system, a single party or institution may try to mobilize citizens’ support for its policies
      • Covert and controlled
      • Process is top-down rather than bottom-up

Interest Aggregation – Competitive Party Systems

  • Political Parties
    • Primary structures of interest aggregation
    • The distinctive and defining goal of a political party – its mobilization of support for policies and candidates
    • Competitive Party System v. Authoritarian Party System

Electoral Systems: Rules of the Game

  • Rules by which elections are conducted
    • Determine who can vote, how people vote, and how the votes get counted
    • Single-member district plurality (SMP) election rule
      • First past the post
      • A variation on this is the majority runoff system (or double ballot)
    • Proportional representation
  • Nominations
    • Primary elections
      • In most countries with SMD elections, the party draws up a list of candidates
        • Closed-list PR systems
        • Open-list system

Competitive Parties and Elections

  • Majoritarian two party systems
    • Dominated by just two parties (US)
    • Two dominant parties and election laws that usually create legislative majorities for one of them (UK)
      • May 2010 election is the exception
  • Majority-coalition systems
    • Parties establish preelectoral coalitions so that voters know which parties will attempt to work together to form a government (Israel)
  • Multiparty systems
    • Election laws and party systems virtually ensure that no party wins a legislative majority (Germany, France)

Interest Aggregation

  • Patron-Client Network
    • Officeholder provides benefits to supporters in exchange for their loyalty

Trends in Interest Aggregation

  • Trend toward democracy?
    • Eastern Europe (began in 1989)
    • Declining acceptance of authoritarian regimes
    • Important authoritarian party systems with exclusive governing parties are still around: China and Cuba
    • Venezuela has become authoritarian over part five years
      • Could populist authoritarian party systems be a trend?
    • Most of the unfree states are in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa

Democracy and Democratization

Democratization:

  • Democratic regime – a set of institutions that allow the citizens to choose the makers of public policy in free, competitive elections
    • Don’t have to be rich
  • Industrialized Democracy – the richest countries with advanced economies and liberal states

4 Different Elections:

  • US 2004: Electoral college, significance of Ohio (swing state)
  • Great Britain 2001: no scheduled elections, Prime Minister calls for elections within 5 years
  • France 2002: Directly elects its President, first ballot had 17 candidates, but only the top 2 participate in a runoff
  • Germany 2002: 4 major parties that form coalitions to pass legislation (lots of compromises)

Common and Not So Common Themes

  • Elections determine who governs
  • Elections are not about basic principles
    • Stable democratic regimes
  • Dissimilarities
    • Electoral systems:
      • Direct v. indirect
        • US and France elect their chief executives
        • GB and Germany do not
      • Proportional v. plurality (single member districts)
        • German Bundestag gives half its seats proportionally
        • US and GB use “first past the post” (whoever got the most votes)
    • Separation of powers (US) v. fusion of powers (UK)

Thinking About Democracy

  • What is democracy
    • Basic rights
    • Competitive elections
    • Rule of law
    • Civil society and civic culture
    • Capitalism and affluence

Procedural v. Substantive Democracy

  • Procedural democracy
    • Presence of “free, fair, competitive” elections
    • Hurdles are present for real democratic procedures
      • Opposition parties silences
      • Votes not counted
    • “Guarded Democracy” or “Illiberal Democracy”
  • Substantive Democracy
    • Procedural standards met
    • Protect more political rights and civil liberties

Democratization:

  • The transformation process from a nondemocratic regime to a procedural democracy to a substantive democracy
  • Samuel Huntington’s “Three Waves of Democratization”
    • Late 19th century (increased education and urbanization)
    • Post WWII era (45-60) (decolonization)
    • Late 1970s (collapse of soviet union)

The Origins of the Democratic State

  • Origins of democratic thought
    • The early democracies: individualism, capitalism, Protestantism, scientific revolution, and exploration
    • Hobbes
    • Laissez-faire
    • Locke
    • Suffrage
  • Building Democracies
    • In Europe and North America, the way democracy developed was largely a result of the way countries and their rulers handled four great transformations over the last five hundred years:
      • The creation of the nation and state itself
      • The role of religion in society and government
      • The development of pressures for democracy
      • The industrial revolution
    • Cleavages (social divisions)
    • Authoritarian leaders, fascism, and WWII
    • The cold war

Political Culture and Participation

  • The Civic Culture
    • Legitimacy: government v. regime
  • Political Parties and Elections
    • Catch-all parties
  • New Divisions
    • Gender
    • Post-materialist
      • 3rd generation affluence – reasonable assumption of productive careers
      • vote on “higher-order” values
  • Interest Groups
  • Political Protest

The Democratic State

  • Presidential and parliamentary systems
    • Presidential: compromise the norm and rapid decision making difficult to prevent abuse of power (Only in the US)
    • Parliamentary: secure majority party or coalition, the prime minister rarely has to compromise, which allows their government to act more quickly and decisively
      • Fused, not separated
      • Cabinet responsibility – principle that requires a prime minister and government to retain the support of a parliamentary majority
      • Votes of confidence – a vote in which the members express their support for (or opposition to) the government’s policies. If it loses, the government must resign.

The Rest of the State

  • High-level civil servants in the bureaucracy
  • Leading interest group representatives
  • Iron Triangle – A variety of close relationships between business leaders, politicians, and civil servants.
    • Those states with the most integrated elite, like France, Germany, and Japan, have been among the most successful economically
    • The US is wary of close operation amongst these groups

Public Policy

  • The interventionist state – governments in industrialized democracies that pursue an active economic policy
    • Basic health care and education
    • Subsidized and/or free education at all levels including universities
    • Unemployment compensation
    • Pensions and other programs for seniors
  • Foreign policy

Conclusion

  • In uneven and imperfect ways, democratic regimes achieve a series of balances better than any other type of government:
    • Between the governors and the governed
    • Between the political world and rest of society
    • Between unbridled capitalism and the interest of those who do not benefit (much) from it
    • Between personal freedoms and the need to maintain order and forge coherent public policy

AP Comp Gov - Russia Short Answer

Russia Short Answer

2010 AP Exam

Three changes made during Putin’s presidency that are evidence that the Russian political system became more authoritarian.

  • Presidential appointment of regional governors instead of direct election
  • Creation of seven federal districts with appointment of super governor or presidential envoys
    • Putin keeps an eye on all areas of Russia
    • Concentration of power
  • Change to selecting half of the federation council by presidential appointment
    • Limits on electoral competition
    • Concentration of power
  • Creation of a dominant party (United Russia)
    • Limits on parties
    • Limits on electoral competition
  • Increased state control of media
    • Limits on media
  • Appointing himself prime minister
    • Concentration of power
  • Arrests and convictions of opposition candidates and economically powerful individuals on limited evidence
    • Limits on opposition
    • Reduction of civil rights

2009 AP Exam

1. Describe Russia’s electoral system before the 2007 Duma elections. Explain how the electoral system shaped the pre-2007 Russian party system.

  • A split electoral system, with one-half “first past the post” and one-half proportional representation
  • A 5% threshold for parties to be included in the PR. Allowed for multiple parties to develop.

2. Describe a specific change to the Russian electoral system that was designed for the 2007 Duma elections and explain its impact on party competition

  • The system became on proportional, no FPTP
  • The party threshold was increased from 5 to 7%
  • It decreased the diversity of political parties in the Duma and strengthened United Russia/other parties that supported Putin

3. Describe Mexico’s current electoral system

  • System of both FPTP and PR in both chambers

4. Describe one electoral reform made in Mexico in the 1990s and explain how that reform affected Mexico’s party system

  • Creation of an electoral commission to regulate campaigns and elections
    • Limited the PR’s power

2008 AP Exam

Define political socialization

  • The process by which people form their ideas about politics and acquire their ideas about government

Identify one agent of political socialization in Russia and explain how that agent you have identified promotes political socialization.

  • The media
  • Propaganda, false information, etc.

2008 AP Exam

1. Define economic liberalization and political liberalization

  • Economic: Less government regulation of the economy and greater participation of private entities. Reducing government intervention in the economy.
  • Political: increasing citizen rights and liberties, minimizing government supervision of society.

2. Describe one economic liberalization policy pursued in Mexico since 1985 and one economic liberalization policy pursued in Russia since 1991

  • Mexico: approval of NAFTA, privatization of banks, joining WTO
  • Russia: shock therapy (changing a centrally planned economy to a market economy almost overnight).

3. Describe one political liberalization policy undertaken in Mexico and one in Russia

  • Mexico: Electoral reforms to reduce corruption
  • Russia: 1993 Constitution guaranteed civil liberties

4. Compare one consequence of economic liberalization on social class in Mexico with one consequence of economic liberalization on social class in Russia.

  • Mexico: farmers suffered economically
  • Russia: incredibly rich oligarchs prospered
  • Growing gap between the rich and poor.

2007 AP Exam

1. Define bicameralism

  • Legislature with two houses

2. Identify which countries studied have a bicameral national legislature

  • UK, Russia, Mexico

3. Explain why a federal democracy is likely to have a bicameral national legislature.

  • To ensure that both regions/territories and individuals have representation.

4. Describe two implications of federalism for the policy-making process

  • Slower lawmaking
  • Broader representation
  • Greater legitimacy

2007 AP Exam

1. Define referendum and describe one advantage for a government of holding a referendum.

  • National vote by the electorate on an issue referred by the government
  • Advantage: more democratic, legitimacy

2. Identify the official who has the power to call a referendum in Russia/GB. Describe one example of the use of one specific national referendum in Russia/GB.

  • Russia: President. Example: ratification of the Russian Constitution.
  • GB: Prime Minister. Example: single currency

2007 AP Exam

1. Define a unitary system of government. Define a federal system of government.

  • Unitary: There is only that national government—no state or local government
  • Federal: separation of power between the national government and state or local government

2. Describe one advantage of each.

  • Unitary: uniform laws throughout the country—no conflicting laws in different areas.
  • Federal: federal government has less power so the people have more say in government.

3. Describe how federal or unitary systems are reflected in the national legislatures in Britain and Russia.

  • Britain: unitary system in that all laws are handled by the PM and his cabinet/House of Commons
  • Russia: federal system—laws and movements are sent through separate institutions to be approved.

4. Describe how, since the late 1990s, Britain has become more federal and Russia has become more unitary.

  • Britain: Britain’s government has devolved power to Northern Ireland and Scotland, who now have their own parliaments and can elect their own representatives.
  • Russia: Putin has stripped local government of their power, placing more power in the central government.

2006 AP Exam

Identify two features of the Russian political system that make it a mixed presidential/parliamentary system of government.

  • Presidential: direct election of the president, fixed election cycle
  • Parliamentary system: irregular election cycle for the duma, PM is accountable to the Duma
  • Mixed system: President can dissolve the DUma

AP Comp Gov - Mexico: Revolution Ends, Change Begins Questions

Revolution Ends, Change Begins

1. The PRI took control in 1929 – what examples of democratization have taken place in Mexico since that time?

Mexico has become significantly more democratic since 1929. The population has changed from being two-thirds rural to being three-quarters urban. The economy has become much more open, while it was previously protectionist and state-dominated. Mexican exports and trade have increased, inflation has decreased, and its economy has stabilized after a quarter-century of turmoil. The addition of a competition agency and human rights commission help to protect citizens. Additionally, the press is now independent of the government, and the courts, central bank, and electoral authorities have become more independent. The largest factor in Mexico’s democratization was the peaceful transition from the PRI to the PAN as Vicente Fox was made president.

2. What are the pros and cons of the PRI’s lack of a concrete platform? Why is it considered a “perfect dictatorship”?

Because the PRI had no concrete platform, it never had an ideology, and anyone could join. This gave it the ability to adapt as the times changed, and allowed a range of presidents from all backgrounds and political dogmas to gain power. It included trade unions, peasant groups, youth movements—all of which made it stronger. Additionally, it rarely used repression, co-opted trade unions by giving their leaders money and power, won the support of peasants by redistributing land, essentially bribed newspapers, and was a patron of the arts. While all of this helped the PRI stay in power, there were also negatives associated with the PRI’s lack of concrete platform. Because there was no central dogma and anyone could join, its followers were split, as was economic growth among them—this created the “two Mexicos” the article talks about.

It’s a “perfect dictatorship” in that it appeared to be a democracy, as a president that couldn’t be reelected headed it, but in every other way it functioned as a dictatorship. The government outwardly had all the characteristics of a democracy, but because the PRI was so widespread and controlled who was elected, the president had almost absolute power.

Fox’s Mexico: Same as It Ever Was?

1. The author Pamela Starr is critical of Fox’s first year as President of Mexico. Keeping in mind the challenges he faced and what he did and didn’t accomplish – do you agree with the author’s perspective? Explain your reasoning, citing specific pieces of evidence.

Though the author makes legitimate points, overall, I disagree with her opinion that Fox’s administration was disappointing. As the first president from a party other than the PRI for the first time in over 70 years, it’s only natural that Fox would face many challenges and that his presidency would be anything but smooth sailing. However, despite the many challenges he faced, he managed to pass two austere budget laws through Congress and get elements of financial reform approved. Though ultimately unable to convince the Zapatista rebels in Chiapas to initiate peace negotiations, he did manage to pass a new law on indigenous people, which was his top legislative priority. This, if nothing else, shows that they were dedicated to sticking to their word. The author does address this point, saying that Fox changed his mind several times, notably concerning the proposed 15% tax on food, medicines, and books. While Fix did eliminate the tax from his proposal, does not necessarily mean that it was the result of negotiation with Carlos Fuentes. It may be that Fox realized a potential detrimental affect of the tax, and was willing to look indecisive in order to protect the people (though this is speculation). The author also states that the executive branch’s organization into three groups concerning quality growth, order and respect, and social development “deepened confusion and inconsistency within the administration.” However, I would argue that this separation of powers is a step in furthering Mexico’s democracy, and that of course any new, major change in government is not going to function perfectly from the outset. I believe that the author makes valid points all around; however, I also think that she fails to recognize that making changes in one year from over 70 years of essential dictatorship is easier said than done.

2. Political parties have a complex history in Mexico. How did the three parties themselves add to the difficulties of Fox’s first year in office? Specifically address the PAN, PRD, and PRI.

The PRD was very unsupportive of Fox and therefore has opposed his legislative agenda consistently. It believes that the transition from the PRI to the PAN brought few changes in policy, and does not make an effort to collaborate with the government because it remains a minority in the legislature. Specifically, it opposes the market based economy strategy Fox continued, and has a deep-seated mistrust of Fox’s ultimate objectives. As a minority party, it has little incentive to work with the legislature, especially because it does not have enough votes to build a majority even when combined with those of the PAN.

Adjusting to its new role as the opposition, the PRI has also been unsupportive of Fox’s presidency. Because it’s the dominant opposition force, not much can be achieved without its cooperation. Policy differences, attempts to organize itself, and the chaos created by the three competing centers of power make it hard to get anything done, and even harder for Fox. The PRI power centers have made demands of the government, but due to internal party politics, they were unable to give up anything in return. Additionally, these internal struggles have prevented them from supporting any controversial policy positions.

Though Fox was elected as a member of the PAN, his relationship with it has not been smooth. He did not get along with Diego Fernandez de Cevallos, the leader of the dominant traditionalist faction, and established a campaign structure independent of the party. He appealed to voters directly, and later forced the PAN to accept his candidacy. He made little effort to involve the PAN in governing, which did little to ease their fears of becoming a party controlled by the presidency, much like the PRI. As a result of this fear, it has been hesitant to fully support Fox and his legislative proposals. For the first few months, it operated as if it were the opposition, particularly concerning Fox’s proposal to increase the autonomy of indigenous communities, which Fox based his legislative measure on.

3. The author makes the argument that “the Fox administration drew heavily on tactics designed in advanced democracies but ineffective in a fledgling democratic order.” What tactics is she describing and why did they not work in Mexico?

It can only be expected that Mexico’s new truly democratic regime would not be perfect after over 70 years of an essentially authoritarian government. Therefore there have been many failed ventures that would have likely worked in advanced democracies, but did not in Mexico. For example, Fox’s attempt to transform PEMEX into an autonomous firm managed on the basis of market principles faced many obstacles, largely due to his appointment of businessmen to the administrative board. Additionally, the announcement that Mexico would fully support the US after 9/11 produced nationalist backlash and unease. Fox’s cabinet also faced problems—each minister was highly independent, which led to conflict and no policy coordination.

AP Comp Gov - New Labour in Britain: Avoiding the Past Questions

“New Labor in Britain: Avoiding the Past”

1. Summarize the author’s argument for WHY the Labor Party received a popular mandate from the British citizens in the 1997 election.

  • The author argues that Blair’s election as party leader in 1994 provided the final push the Labour Part needed to win the majority.

2. In order to modernize Blair needed to change TWO things about the Labour party platform. What needed to be changed and why were these changes so necessary?

  • The first change was to revise Clause 4 in their constitution, which committed the party to “the common ownership of the means of production.” This was necessary because this idea was outdated and drove away many potential supporters.
  • The other change was to distance himself and the party from the trade unions, which helped Blair to prove that Labor had changed since 1979.

3. What were the components of “Thatcherism” and how did they contribute to the eventual downfall of the Conservative party?

  • Thatcherism was an economic theory that advocated individual enterprise and reduced state intervention. The two signature components of late Thatcherism were the regressive poll tax and Thatcher’s increasing opposition to further European integration, both of which were hated by the larger public and led much the population to view the Conservative party as split.

4. How new is the platform of New Labor? Why has selling the “Third Way” to the public been difficult?

  • Blair has proclaimed that New Labour is genuinely new and that its vision was focused on the problems of the late twentieth century and beyond. A large part of the newness of New Labor is that is adopted most of Thatcherism, which is part of the reason selling the “Third Way” to the public has been difficult. Many believe that it merely accepted the legacy of Thatcher and did a better job of marketing it than the Conservatives.

5. What changes in policy did Blair make under the “Third Way”?

  • Blair allowed the Bank of England to determine interest rates, was involved in peace processes in Northern Ireland, accepted the “social chapter” of the European Union, introduced the “new Deal at Work” initiation, and proposed “Fairness at Work” (which would help to reshape industrial relations). Additionally, plans to create assemblies in Scotland and Wales, devolve power regionally, recreate London government, and reduce/replace the House of Lords all indicate a willingness to reshape the nature of government.

“Who Killed New Labour?”

1. According to the author, why is New Labour dying?

  • The author argues that new labor is stagnated and losing much of the steam that it gained under Blair. Its failure of its old policies and inability to produce new policies have led to them slowly falling from their 3 term rule.

2. The article discusses three culprits – Mr. Brown, old age, and its platform. Explain how each has played a role in the downfall of New Labour. Then, explain where you think most of the responsibility lies and why!

  • Gordon Brown is blamed for the death of New Labor because of the failure of many of his policies and the belief that he is unfair and afraid of a change in power.
  • Old age is a factor because New Labor has been in power for one of the longest periods in British history. There is evidence that the downfall of New Labour began before Gordon Brown, as well as the inevitable economic downturn that contradicts much early party rhetoric, which has not had a satisfactory response.
  • The platform is blamed because many of their policies have failed or slowed and not been replaced.

3. What role has David Cameron played in the downfall of New Labour?

  • David Cameron, as the leader of the conservative party, is adopting New Labour ideas, which increases support for his party by people who may have previously supported New Labour.

4. Should the Labour party choose a new leader next week at its meeting? Why or why not? Can they keep a majority in Parliament with elections looming?

  • The Labour Party should not choose a new leader because he is already in power and not completely to blame for New Labor’s decline. A change such as that would disrupt the party and weaken it even more.

AP Comp Gov - Mexico's Long March to Democracy Questions

Mexico’s Long March to Democracy


1. What are the reasons that allowed the PRI to maintain power so long? How did they orchestrate such a broad constituency?

The PRI, though hated in the end, stayed in power largely due to their achievements while in power. PRI leaders pacified and united the country after the 1910 revolution, putting together a national identity and controlling the armed forces. They established universal primary education, subsidized public universities, promoted industrialization, urbanization, and a strong middle class. By promising political stability, health care, land reform, temporary rural employment programs, and programs to help the poor, the PRI won support from the suffering peasant, indigenous, and urban poor classes.


2. Why did the political legitimacy of the PRI begin to fade?

According to the article, the 1968 massacre of 300 protesting students in Mexico City was the watershed event that exposed the brutality of the PRI regime. The PAN party’s inception in 1980 drew supporters away from the PRI, made up at first of alienated ranchers and industrialists. Continued voting irregularities further decreased faith in the PRI, especially in the case of Cárdenas, who, following his failure to democratize the PRI, ended up as the candidate of a four-party coalition that is believed by many to have won the election. Additionally, the economy did horribly essentially from 1976 to 1994, with an increase in international debt, devaluation of the peso, government cutbacks, discouraged investment (which sunk most small and medium-sized businesses), and the obliteration of gains in income and welfare for the population. Colosio’s assassination, the 1994 devaluation and subsequent depression, government scandals, and Zendillos resignation from the party led the PRI to become lost and widely disliked. In 1997, the PRI lost control of the Chamber of Deputies, and abandoned its constituency of small farmers, migrant workers, and self-employed vendors and shopkeepers to economic disgrace.


3. What are the pros and cons of Fox's "Revolution of Hope"? What changes has Fox been able to make? What parts of the plan will take much longer to achieve?

Fox’s “revolution of hope” aimed to bring the government and citizens to work together to work to secure progress for Mexico. He wanted Mexico to be multiethnic, pluralistic, tolerant, and respectful to political opposition and a free press. Additionally, he wanted to look after the indigenous, handicapped, migrant workers in the US, microentrepreneurs, and working mothers. Fox wanted Mexico to have economic growth high enough to maintain full employment, to reduce inflation, to stabilize the economy, and to establish a common market with the US and Canada that includes a shared currency and labor mobility. Fox planned to address the great disparities afflicting the poor, reduce Latin America’s social and economic dualism, expand education and health services, fund microcredit and industrial programs to link the poor to the national and global export economies, and promote democratic political participation.

Many people, especially leftists, see his plans as “Mexico, Inc.” They are suspicious of his background as a very successful businessman and cabinet appointments. The cabinet appointments in particular were controversial due to potential conflicts of interest—the ministers of communications and finance had worked as executives in companies linked to the telephone monopoly and the banking establishment. There are also fears over an oil monopoly and potential erosion of nationalistic and welfare orientations of the Mexican state.

Fox has was able to pass a budget that included revenue-sharing and an increase in federal antipoverty funds for the states. He has also combated corruption, created a climate of trust for renewing dialogue with the Zapatista guerrillas in Chiapas state, made bold appointments to the National Security Council, and appointed a presidential coordinator of the Citizen Alliance.

His goals to stimulate economic growth in Mexico enough to maintain full employment, reduce inflation, stabilize the economy, and establish a common market with the US and Canada will take much longer. Additionally, his wish to increase the real income of Mexico’s 40 million poor by 50%, reduce the number of those living in poverty from 40 million to 28 million and cut those living in extreme poverty from 18 million to 8 million will also take a significant amount of time to accomplish. His overall goals for the “Revolution of Hope” will collectively take a lot of time, resources, and effort to make reality.


4. How has Mexico become more democratic over the last several decades? Do you think this trend will continue?

Beginning with the PRI, though it was not altogether democratic itself, democratization has been a theme throughout the last several decades. The PRI launched political reforms legalizing marginal opposition parties and opening the Congress to opposition representation, which was a major step in democratization at the time. Additionally, Cárdenas attempted to democratize the PRI and end the dedazo (though he ultimately ended up splitting from the party). Cárdenas’s near election showed a large move towards democratization. The largest movement was obviously the shifting of power from the PRI party to the democratic PAN party. I do think this trend will continue, especially if Mexico continues to make reforms as it has been and parties such as the PAN continue to hold power through fair elections.